The Art of Procrastination

Emails upon emails keep piling on. From bill reminders to that of an old friend asking for an advice to that of alerts from my banks to those newsletters on latest in law, biotechnology and business to book recommendations from contacts on goodreads. I prefer them either deleted, replied or marked read, but thanks to the gene of procrastination in my genome that expresses lazy proteins in my ‘phenome’ that I let the pile increase until it weighs heavy. Heavy on my conscience. Yes, conscience! How would you know? Have you procrastinated ever? If not, then practise this subtle art of laziness. It gives ample time at hand to do “nothing”, but cracks down heavily on conscience from time to time, just to let the artist move on to “newer” procrastinations. There is no fun in procrastinating matters you have procrastinated beyond a limit. Procrastination is, therefore, prolonged as habit by procrastination itself, through self-regulation mechanisms a la genetic regulations in a cell, usually by cracking whip on conscience. You need new procrastinations to keep this art alive throughout your life.

In spirit of my new year resolution, I have quite [sadly] overcome the procrastination in my professional capacity, but I [fortunately] continue to procrastinate matters of personal worth. Why attend them now when you can attend them later? I don’t procrastinate because I lack skills to attend to matters or complete the tasks. Au contraire, I procrastinate because I know, and know it very well that I can perfectly deliver in nick of time. Be it any task or work or mission. I do not understand why people complete tasks before time. There is no fun in doing so. It is so mundane. No experience gained, no sweat lost. Then, why do we work if we cannot maintain this equilibrium of loss and gain?

Procrastination doesn’t lie on fringes of modern work culture. People practise it all the time, from people in small start-up that procrastinate pitching to a VC in eternal hope to clinch one client before going to VC to people in a large multi-billion dollar multinational corporation that procrastinate till the date of product release. However, I must warn you. I must warn you that procrastination is not for faint-hearted, and it therefore, must be practised only by those who are genius, competent and know how to put things perfectly as required when the time is nigh. If you are none of these or are unable to click in the eleventh hour or you falter under an assumed [rather imagined] pressure of working in eleventh hour, procrastination is not for you. PLEASE, refrain from it. You bring bad name to us all ‘genius procrastinators’. You add nothing special or more than what we have to add, to a report or to your work or to a task assigned to you or a programme written by you despite you finishing it before time, however, we still have to ‘suffer’ because of your weird manner of staying punctual to deadlines.

Procrastination, in my view, is not pushing deadlines further. No. That would be professional harakiri and contrary to professionalism. Healthy and genius procrastination strives within deadlines and feeds on professionalism. You don’t push deadlines further. You push the critical mass of your work/task towards the deadlines. In short, you sit pretty and do ‘nothing’ until the eleventh hour cometh. To sit idly is not the way of utilising your bliss period of procrastination, however, you must utilise it to enhance your learnings in the areas and subject matters that your profession has so brilliantly deprived you from indulging in. The non-procrastinators think that we, the procrastinators, ‘waste’ our time. No, Sir or Madam, we simply don’t ! To sit idly or sleep is a waste of time.  We, the intellectual procrastinators, have higher tastes and needs, and use this time to indulge with ourselves. To read books, newspapers, enjoying exotic sea food in a remote place is not waste of time, it is indulging in one own self, away from the mundanities of work and clients.

The good procrastinator is able to wield his/her brush naturally and perfectly on the canvass of otherwise mundane job, at the eleventh hour, and fill it with colours of brilliance. I also procrastinate cleaning my room. In that period, I indulge in sipping green tea and reading books. The clothes upon clothes and books upon books and bedsheets upon bedsheets keep piling on, until I am surrounded by a fort-like structure made up of these ensembles. Then I get up, before it gets ‘too dirty’ or when I have a gut feeling that if the room isn’t cleaned and the doomsday is nigh, I would die in badly kept room. In order to prevent myself from dying in unkempt surroundings, I get up and clean my room and flat.

Procrastination must not be loathed, however procrastination by a lesser human must be sabotaged and criticised at any cost. Those who are incapable or are unskilled must not expose themselves to perils of procrastination, since it will be too risky a proposition for them. Procrastination is for absolute geniuses, who use the time, thus stolen from the routine of life, for intellectual or delightful pursuits. I attribute my knowledge on literature, poetry, essays, politics, philosophy and humans to procrastination. If not for procrastination, I would make a boring cog in a giant wheel of mundanity.  Long live the procrastination!

Posted in In a humorous embodiment, In a literary embodiment, In a personal embodiment, In a philosophical embodiment | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Sonnet I: That which Sings

I wonder whether David has his usual daily conversations in sonnet form. Effortless sonneteer of our times! Loved this one!

David Emeron's avatarDavid Emeron: Sonnets

I sing to thee of winter’s rain, my sweet;
I sing of hours spent and hours kept;
Of all the dreams beneath this rain, we’ve slept;
For all the time I’ve held thy head, thy feet,

I sing to thee, although my heart is fleet.
If not for me then thou wouldst not have wept;
Thy tears doth fill my pen which make adept,
And make me to produce such indiscreet

Reflection. When I think of all those hours,
Innumerable, they, within our frame;
As sore beset with devils, as with flowers;
Of all the seemingly unending pain;
Those times that seemed controlled by other powers;
I remember, then, how soothing is the rain.

This sonnet is part of a short sequence; click here to read it all:

View original post

Posted in In a poetic embodiment | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Of books and their friendship

I have grown up in a family where mother is an ardent reader, while father is just a newspaper reader. Being elder son, I am closer to my mother, and therefore I think that it’s from her that I have my genes that express penchant for reading books on range of subjects. Apart from her subtle influence, her timely and vocal interventions, while growing up, with the quote: Books are a man’s best friend, also made me explore the world of books right from the beginning. She was well aware of my reticence and recluse out of my shy persona, and perhaps because of that reason, she encouraged me to be friends with books instead.

Despite being introduced to the quote in the early years of childhood and in cordial relationship with them ever since, I took about 28 years, many relationships and their eventual fall to realise the profound message, in that quote, by my own. I have realised that no other relationship is as sustainable as that of modern human with the books. Those who burn, pulp or censor the books, also read them before indulging in these outrageous activities. They too perhaps love the books, which is why they read the particular book, before pulping it due to disagreement, and take them very seriously. The relation of the humans and the books, therefore, goes much deeper than imagined. Even though, I used the phrase “modern human”, I am regretting it already, since I now realise that the relation goes much before the modern/current human thought started to evolve, i.e. even before the invention of printing press; else how do you explain religions?

If only one example of the profound impact of books on the humans is to be given, the rise and rise of all the religions, all of which are centred around one or more books, is the epitome. The Eastern religious and associated philosophical thoughts, though existed orally to begin with, but eventually libraries such as viharas were established for housing books preserving those works of literature in letters. Nevertheless, despite oral traditions of Eastern saints and philosophers, a book is a book, whether orally available or in a glorious ensemble of letters of a script of a language. The Western religious and associated philosophical thoughts have always been centred on single text and its various offshoots and interpretations. From Old Testament to Quran, and from Vedas to Buddhacarita, the impact that such books or texts still have on the human struggle, psyche, politics, geography and society is indeed profound and telling of the relationship of humans with the books. This also tells how the books have driven and altered the struggle of man from time to time, and how they have kept it ‘essentially same’ over the intellectual evolution of humans.

I have often stressed that perseverance is the hallmark of  ‘true’ relationships, be it true love or true friendship or true marriage. The human relation with books has shown consistent perseverance over many millennia, so much so that despite all kind of censorship, pulping or burning, books continue to be read and lauded; and why not? It is easier to be friends with them, fall in love with them and always want them to be by your side under all circumstances of life, even if they disagree with us or we disagree with them, or are repulsive to our thoughts, or annoy us or let us down at some moments or we let them down at some moments; but they are there for us. Always. Never leaving us. It is mostly us who leave them – out of human frivolity, but they don’t.

[I will publish this in two parts. This is first part. The second part will start from where I left in first part]

Posted in In a literary embodiment, In a personal embodiment | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Are personal relationships overrated?

Aristotle’s famous and immortal words, Man is by nature a social animal, were cited as one of the reasons, by my teacher in elementary school, for study of social sciences. Upon the foundation of this sentence, was laid the little but strong edifice of my training on history, civics, geography and economics until secondary school. I continue to study these subjects till date through auto-didacticism. Even though the sentence provides an exact reason to indulge in study of history, civics, geography and economics, the arrangement of words has always perplexed me, for man may be, by nature, a social animal, but I, by nature, have been a man of shy persona, and the one who generally avoids society.  The sentence, therefore, lies in exact contradiction to my own nature. So, this sentence has bowled me over ever since my teacher at elementary school introduced me to it. I am more comfortable in my own company than being in the company of a fellow human.

Being shy doesn’t mean that I have no friends, in fact, I am rather flamboyant whenever in company of my ‘friends’, and I can speak in public with much gusto, can give stellar presentations on technical or non-technical subject matter to a large audience, I interact with clients regularly and I am always willing to give a helping hand to complete strangers too. However, I am exceptionally poor at befriending a total stranger or strike a conversation with him/her if I do not find any common ground with him/her. I will not try to form common ground too. I will not make an attempt  to forge a relationship, because I don’t feel any need of it, if it develops by its own, I will take certain time to get comfortable with it. Therefore when recently I went to a social gathering, I preferred to stay alone in the crowd, and did not indulge in talking to or mingling with anyone there, unlike the rest of the crowd. I did talk, but only with the organiser, and that too with economy of words. This was not the first time that it happened so, and to be honest I had no “strain”, I was too comfortable in my own skin, observing people, being a textbook spectator of the events nearby, and enjoying my occasional sips of this super green tea and more-than-occasional bites of chicken nuggets.

Let me contradict the age old wisdom of man, by nature, being a social animal [as explained by Aristotle]. I would state that man, by nature, is a lonely animal. In saying so I assume that in the term “social”, Aristotle included all of personal relationships too. As for social relationships, if only man had not developed a complex economic system [I would rather call it “feeding system”] based on these words of Aristotle, man would feel no urge of indulging in trade and commerce. However, the things are out of hands now, and the economic system continues to get complicated by every passing second, and therefore, one of the two reasons, I need fellow men is to indulge in trade, so as to secure my bread. The second reason I need fellow men is to quench my intellectual thirst, so as to survive in trade, and for that we need authors, publishers, distributors, banks and whole set of other trades. As I see it, I need social relationships as a result of being a child of 20th century, where I had little say in devising economic systems of modern times, and therefore, I need society to serve my selfish needs while I serve its selfish needs.

However, in matters of personal relationships, Man is too intellectual to feel the need of such hokum of relationships at all. Some men including me have fallen in the trap, but only to realise the ultimate truth that personal relationships are over-rated, and Man can do as good without them. Moreover, given the complex economic systems of our times, as the Man evolves, or as the society evolves, the Man will find respite in seclusion or loneliness, neither in the crowd nor in the company of  friends, relatives or spouse. The best products of Man’s ingenuity has come from men/women wallowing in seclusion or loneliness. The best paintings, music, inventions, discoveries, socio-economic theories, books, poems and any other work of human ingenuity, have all come from men or women who largely found society as their observational laboratory for testing their hypothesis. I have a high liking for Shakespeare’s high-on-emotion tragedies, but Shakespeare has always presented them with a big element of irony hidden in them, which often makes me think that Shakespeare’s work is all about nothingness or meaninglessness of life and these personal relationships. The way he mocks at love and personal relationships in his ‘tragedies’ is very subtle and sometimes very vulgar too, but only to bring forth the truth about them.

When I look back into my own personal history and compare it with my present, I find that people who often found living without me as an impossible dream, are doing just as fine or in fact much better without me at present, and ironically, an even deeper bond has been established by them with people who once invited their scorn, which I believe will meet the same fate, if not for social obligations such as marriage etc. The personal relationship of friendship and animosity are, therefore, both over-rated. You would do just as bad without an enemy, and just as good without a friend or lover or a spouse. There was a time, when it was hard for me to imagine a life without certain people, and yet I am living, imagining life without them, even if I am in perpetual saudade, but the fact that I am living is living-proof of my assertion that my feeling was, perhaps, over-rated. In childhood days, there were friends with whom it seemed it is a ‘friendship forever’, but somehow things are different today, and I realise that I actually need no friend or company per se. Even if I need a company of a friend or spouse, I would need it to serve my lowly selfish needs of sex or entertainment or enjoyment, perhaps to indulge in schadenfreude or to have kids, but not for my higher selfish needs of trade and quenching intellectual curiosity. In my experience, I have found myself to be dispensable for the people I have had any kind of relationship with. Even my mother has stated that she can do without me, even if with tears in her eyes and a shiver in her voice. “Move on” – the convenient phrase invented by Man takes toll of all personal relationships and feelings. “Move on“, a lowly phrase, as I have found, is much stronger than the perfectly constructed English sentence -“I love you“. Most people just move on and live life just as the way or even better than the one they lived while being with you.

Therefore, I feel, all these relationships of love, friendship, mother, father, son, daughter, cousin, uncle, husband, wife, etc. are all overrated. Almost all people, at least those lacking perseverance [which is like 99.9% of humans], move on and all of them are exceptionally good in doing so. I now take relationships [any] with a pinch of salt, since no man is indispensable, and without me they can live just as good or perhaps even better, but no worse. We must take our social relationships of trade and commerce seriously, but personal relationships casually. The downfall starts when we change these respective priorities.

P.S. Many readers of this post may be in love with someone or be in a great friendship or have a great family or spouse, and will find my assertions to be ridiculous and demeaning their relationships, but that is not the intent of my post. Ironically, I have a liking for, and greatly respect those personal relationships, which stand the test of time, adversaries, the moments of indecisiveness, the originality of man [that is accepting a fellow human as he/she is], and the moments of reality/truth and yet only to emerge stronger than before, and thus proving my assertions wrong. In short, who show perseverance in their personal relationships, I have highest of regards for them. 

P.P.S. I want to state many more things, and many more opinions on this subject, but saving it for some other day, hence the abrupt ending!

Posted in In a dark embodiment, In a literary embodiment, In a personal embodiment, In a philosophical embodiment, In an observational embodiment | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Sonnet VI: Her Call

David Emeron's avatarDavid Emeron: Sonnets

I hear the rain; she calleth as she did
So many years ago. But now I can
Not heed this pain. She claimed me as her man;
No longer is it so. Thus am I hid

From she, whom hath she been, my dearest love.
Thou canst but ask: But why dost thou forsake
This holy path of love which thou bespake
To be the flask who’s nectars rank above

All fruit; wherethrough, all Gods and men, subsist.
But to be true, I sometimes answer her;
Though not so loudly she should know exists
The man she proudly loved, because he were
The shell of what he was, so shan’t she know
The depths, so shut, a failing love may go…

This sonnet is part of a short sequence; click here to read it all:

Permalink

View original post

Posted in In a poetic embodiment | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment